Beta-blocker therapy in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and chronic obstructive lung disease in an ambulatory care setting

Pharmacy Practice (Internet)

  • Jennifer J. Schimmer1PharmD, BCPS. Clinical Pharmacy Specialist in Cardiology, Kaiser Permanente Colorado; Clinical Instructor, University of Colorado Denver School of Pharmacy, Denver, CO, United States.
  • Sarah J. Billups2PharmD, BCPS. Clinical Pharmacy Specialist in Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado; Clinical Assistant Professor, University of Colorado Denver School of Pharmacy, Denver, CO, United States.
  • Thomas Delate3PhD, MS. Clinical Pharmacy Research Scientist, Kaiser Permanente Colorado; Clinical Instructor, University of Colorado Denver School of Pharmacy, Denver, CO, United States.

Volume 7 Issue 4 Pages 205-212

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate beta blocker persistence six months after beta-blocker initiation or dose titration in heart failure (HF) patients with COPD compared to those without COPD. Secondary objectives included comparison of beta-blocker dose achieved, changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and incidence of hospitalizations or emergency department (ED) visits during follow-up. Methods: We conducted a matched, retrospective, cohort study including 86 patients with COPD plus concomitant HF (LVEF ≤40%) and 137 patients with HF alone. All patients were followed in an outpatient HF clinic. Eligible patients had a documented LVEF ≤40% and were initiated or titrated on a beta-blocker in the HF clinic. Patients were matched based on LVEF (categorized as ≤ 20% or 21-40%), gender, and age (> or ≤70 years). The primary outcome was beta blocker persistence at 6 months. Secondary outcomes were dose achieved, LVEF, and incidence of hospitalizations or ED visits. Results: There were no differences between the COPD and non-COPD groups in beta-blocker persistence at six-month follow-up (94.2% vs. 93.4% respectively, adjusted p=0.842). The proportion of patients who achieved a daily metoprolol dose equivalent of at least 100 mg was similar between the groups (adjusted p=0.188). The percent of patients with at least one ED visit or hospitalization in the six-month post-titration period was substantial but similar between the groups (53.5% and 48.2% for COPD and non-COPD patients, respectively, adjusted p=0.169). Conclusion: Our results support the use of beta-blockers in the population of heart failure patients with COPD and without reactive airway disease.

Keywords

  • Adrenergic beta-Antagonists
  • Heart Failure
  • Pulmonary Disease
  • Chronic Obstructive
  • United States
Pharmacy Practice

Loading…