Incidence and pattern of anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter at tertiary hospital in Oman

Pharmacy Practice

  • Kholoud AlBadi1Clinical Pharmacy Department, Diwan of Royal Court Polyclinic, Oman.
  • Mohamed Al Rawahi2Department of Medicine, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Oman.
  • Yousuf Al Suleimani3Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Oman.

Volume 23 Issue 1 Pages 1-6

DOI: 10.18549/PharmPract.2025.1.3103

Abstract

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) are the two most common cardiac arrhythmias encountered in clinical practice. Anticoagulants are the cornerstone in cerebrovascular accident prevention in these patients. Despite their role in reducing stroke risk, emergency room visits, and overall treatment costs, studies have shown that oral anticoagulants (OAC) are underutilized, even in high-risk patients. Objective: The aim of this study is to explore the appropriateness and pattern of anticoagulant prescriptions in patients with AF and/or AFL in a tertiary hospital as recommended by the international guidelines. Method: This retrospective observational study was conducted by reviewing the electronic medical records of 389 adult patients with either AF or AFL in Sultan Qaboos University Hospital (SQUH) between July 2018 and July 2020. The appropriateness of oral anticoagulation was assessed according to international guidelines, namely, 2020 Canadian Cardiology Society (CCS), 2020 European Society of Cardiology (ESC), and 2019 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology/Heart Rhythm Society (AHA/ACC/HRS). Analysis was performed using univariate statistics (Chi-square and percentages) to report categorical data. Results: Oral anticoagulants were prescribed appropriately in 91% of the patients according to CCS guidelines, and 92% and 96% according to ESC and (AHA/ACC/HRS) class Ia and IIa recommendations, respectively. Among non-anticoagulated patients (28 patients, 9%) had proper justification. On the other hand, 38 patients (9.8%) out of the whole cohort (389) had a CHADS-65 score of zero but received OAC mostly due to cardioversion, rheumatic heart disease, or mechanical heart valve prosthesis. Novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) were the most commonly used OAC 251/336 (75%), with rivaroxaban being the main drug used 234/250 (92%) of all NOAC prescriptions. 75% of patients with eGFR<50 ml/min received the proper dose of rivaroxaban. Bleeding was the most frequently reported side effect of OAC in 52 (13.4%) of the entire cohort. Conclusion: Nearly 91% of patients with AF/AFL followed at SQUH were prescribed an appropriate anticoagulant as per international guidelines. The decisions to anticoagulate a patient with AF/AFL and the type of anticoagulant used were appropriate.

Keywords

  • anticoagulation
  • atrial fibrillation
  • atrial flutter
Pharmacy Practice

Loading…