Effects of a computerized provider order entry and a clinical decision support system to improve cefazolin use in surgical prophylaxis: a cost saving analysis

Pharmacy Practice

  • Lucas Miyake Okumura1Clinical Pharmacy Division, Porto Alegre Clinical Hospital, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
  • Izelandia Veroneze2Infection Control Service, Clinical Hospital, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
  • Celia Ines Burgardt2Infection Control Service, Clinical Hospital, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
  • Marta Francisca de Fátima Fragoso2Infection Control Service, Clinical Hospital, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.

Volume 14 Issue 3 Pages 1-7

DOI: 10.18549/PharmPract.2016.03.717

Abstract

Background: Computerized Provider Order Entry (CPOE) and Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) help practitioners to choose evidence-based decisions, regarding patients' needs. Despite its use in developed countries, in Brazil, the impact of a CPOE/CDSS to improve cefazolin use in surgical prophylaxis was not assessed yet. Objective: We aimed to evaluate the impact of a CDSS to improve the use of prophylactic cefazolin and to assess the cost savings associated to inappropriate prescribing. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study that compared two different scenarios: one prior CPOE/CDSS versus after software implementation. We conducted twelve years of data analysis (3 years prior and 9 years after CDSS implementation), where main outcomes from this study included: cefazolin Defined Daily Doses/100 bed-days (DDD), crude costs and product of costs-DDD (cost-DDD/100 bed-days). We applied a Spearman rho non-parametric test to assess the reduction of cefazolin consumption through the years. Results: In twelve years, 84,383 vials of cefazolin were dispensed and represented 38.89 DDD/100 bed-days or USD 44,722.99. Surgical wards were the largest drug prescribers and comprised >95% of our studied sample. While in 2002, there were 6.31 DDD/100 bed-days, 9 years later there was a reduction to 2.15 (p<0.05). In a scenario without CDSS, the hospital would have consumed 75.72 DDD/100 bed-days, which is equivalent to USD 116 998.07. It is estimated that CDSS provided USD 50,433.39 of cost savings. Conclusion: The implementation of a CPOE/CDSS helped to improve prophylactic cefazolin use by reducing its consumption and estimated direct costs.

Keywords

  • Cost Savings
  • Clinical Pharmacy Information Systems
  • Decision Support Systems
  • Clinical
  • Medical Order Entry Systems
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents
  • Hospitals
  • Pharmacists
  • Brazil
Pharmacy Practice

Loading…