Hyperlipidemia medication management in patients admitted for a myocardial infarction

Pharmacy Practice

  • Jerrica E. Shuster1University of Southern Nevada College of Pharmacy, Henderson, NV, United States.
  • Meghan N. Jeffres1University of Southern Nevada College of Pharmacy, Henderson, NV, United States., 2University Medical Center of Southern Nevada Department of Pharmacy, Henderson, NV, United States., 3University of Nevada School of Medicine Department of Internal Medicine, Henderson, NV, United States.
  • Sean M. Barclay1University of Southern Nevada College of Pharmacy, Henderson, NV, United States., 2University Medical Center of Southern Nevada Department of Pharmacy, Henderson, NV, United States., 3University of Nevada School of Medicine Department of Internal Medicine, Henderson, NV, United States.
  • Ragini Bhakta1University of Southern Nevada College of Pharmacy, Henderson, NV, United States., 4St. Rose Dominican Hospital Department of Pharmacy, Henderson, NV, United States.

Volume 9 Issue 1 Pages 31-36

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to determine the percentage of patients admitted for acute myocardial infarction currently prescribed a statin, with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) <100 mg/dL, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) <50 mg/dL for men and <55 mg/dL for women and evaluate their medication management with a focus on niacin initiation. Methods: This was a retrospective study from 12/07 to 12/09, conducted at a private, community hospital. Inclusion criteria required patients to have an acute myocaridal infarction (AMI) ICD-9 code, troponin ≥0.2 ng/dL and lipid panel performed within 96 hours of troponin. Patients with a triglyceride level > 400 mg/dL were excluded. The residual risk population consisted of patients currently taking a statin with LDL <100 mg/dL and HDL <50/55 mg/dL. Patients were excluded from the residual risk population if they were on niacin, had an allergy to or previously failed niacin therapy, or expired within 72 hours. Results: A total of 553 patients experiencing an AMI had lipid panels available for evaluation. The mean LDL was 97.3 ± 36.0 mg/dL, mean HDL was 33.5 ± 11.1 mg/dL, and mean triglycerides were 133.1 ± 71.3 mg/dL. The majority of patients (n=521, 94.2%) had an HDL < 50 or 55 mg/dL respective of gender. Ninety-two (80.0%) residual risk patients had no change in their home lipid medications post AMI. Fifteen (13.0%) residual risk patients had their dose of statin medication increased. Seven (6.1%) residual risk patients were initiated on niacin. Conclusions: The study results confirm an existence of a residual risk population with nearly 25% of AMI patients meeting the criteria. The results also confirm a low incidence of medication intervention in the residual risk population post AMI (20.0%) regarding lipid therapy, including the initiation of niacin in only 6.1% of patients.

Keywords

  • Myocardial Infarction
  • Niacin
  • Cholesterol
  • HDL
  • United States
Pharmacy Practice

Loading…