Effects of staff education and standardizing dosing and collection times on vancomycin trough appropriateness in ward patients

Pharmacy Practice

  • Drayton A. Hammond1Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States., 2Department of Pharmacy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Medical Center, Little Rock, AR, United States.
  • Lexis N. Atkinson3Department of Pharmacy, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, Little Rock, AR, United States.
  • Taylor B. James2Department of Pharmacy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Medical Center, Little Rock, AR, United States.
  • Jacob T. Painter1Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States.
  • Katherine Lusardi2Department of Pharmacy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Medical Center, Little Rock, AR, United States.

Volume 15 Issue 2 Pages 1-5

DOI: 10.18549/PharmPract.2017.02.949

Abstract

Background: Many institutions have guidelines for initiation and monitoring, but not timing, of vancomycin. Objective: Our objective was to evaluate vancomycin trough collection appropriateness before and after an initiative to change the dosing and trough collection times in ward patients. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of ward patients from May 2014-16 who received scheduled intravenous vancomycin was performed. Nurse managers and pharmacists provided staff education. Differences between pre- and post-intervention groups were compared using student's t-test for continuous data and chi-square test for categorical data. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between the pre-intervention (n=124) and post-intervention (n=122) groups except for weight-based maintenance dose (15.3 mg/kg vs. 16.5 mg/kg, p=0.03) and percentage of troughs collected with morning labs (14% vs. 87%, p<0.001). Patients in the pre- and post-intervention groups received a similar frequency of loading doses (14.5% vs. 16%, p=0.68). There was no significant difference in percentage of vancomycin troughs collected appropriately at 30 (40% vs. 42%, p=0.72), 60 (57% vs. 63%, p=0.35), or 75 (60% vs. 68%, p=0.22) minutes from the scheduled time of the next dose. Conclusion: Staff education and standardizing collection of vancomycin troughs with morning blood collections did not affect the percentage of appropriately collected vancomycin troughs.

Keywords

  • Vancomycin
  • Drug Monitoring
  • Pharmacists
  • Dose-Response Relationship
  • Drug
  • Plasma
  • Pharmacokinetics
  • Quality Improvement
  • Retrospective Studies
  • United States
Pharmacy Practice

Loading…